THE REPORT OF THE FIFTEENTH FINANCE COMMISSION
Terms
of Reference
- The
Commission was asked to recommend performance incentives for States in
many areas like power sector, adoption of DBT, solid waste management etc.
- to
recommend funding mechanism for defence and internal security.
- The
XVFC’s Report is organised in four volumes.
- Volume
I and II, as in the past, contain the main report and
the accompanying annexes.
- Volume
III is devoted to the Union Government and examines key departments
in greater depth, with the medium-term challenges and the roadmap ahead.
- Volume
IV is entirely devoted to the States.
- In
total, main report has 117 core recommendations. Vol-III and IV has
numerous suggested reforms for the Union ministries and State governments
respectively.
Vertical devolution:
- In
order to maintain predictability and stability of resources, especially
during the pandemic, XVFC has recommended maintaining the vertical
devolution at 41 per cent – the same as in our report for 2020-21. It
is at the same level of 42 per cent of the divisible pool as
recommended by FC-XIV.
- However,
it has made the required adjustment of about 1 per cent due to the changed
status of the erstwhile State of Jammu and Kashmir into the new Union
Territories of Ladakh and Jammu and Kashmir.
- In
XVFC’s assessment, gross tax revenues for 5-year period is
expected to be 135.2 lakh crore. Out of that, Divisible pool (after
deducting cesses and surcharges & cost of collection) is estimated
to be Rs.103 lakh crore.
- States’
share at 41 per cent of divisible pool comes to 42.2 lakh
crore for 2021-26 period.
- Including total
grants of Rs. 10.33 lakh crore (details later) and tax devolution of
Rs. 42.2 lakh crore, aggregate transfers to States is estimated to
remain at around 50.9 per cent of the divisible pool during 2021-26
period.
- Total
XVFC transfers (devolution + grants) constitutes about 34 per cent
of estimated Gross Revenue Receipts of the Union leaving adequate
fiscal space for the Union to meet its resource requirements and spending
obligations on national development priorities.
Horizontal Devolution:
- Based
on principles of need, equity and performance, overall devolution formula
is as follows.
Criteria |
Weight (%) |
Population |
15.0 |
Area |
15.0 |
Forest
& ecology |
10.0 |
Income
distance |
45.0 |
Tax &
fiscal efforts |
2.5 |
Demographic
performance |
12.5 |
Total |
100 |
- On
horizontal devolution, while XVFC agreed that the Census 2011
population data better represents the present need of States, to be
fair to, as well as reward, the States which have done better on the
demographic front, XVFC has assigned a 12.5 per cent weight to the
demographic performance criterion.
- XVFC has
re-introduced “tax effort criterion” to reward fiscal performance.
Revenue
deficit grants:
- Based
on uniform norms of assessing revenues and expenditure of the States and
the Union, XVFC has recommended total revenue deficit grants (RDG) of
Rs 2,94,514 crore over the award period for seventeen States.
Local Governments:
- The
total size of the grant to local governments should be Rs. 4,36,361
crore for the period 2021-26.
- Of
these total grants, Rs. 8,000 crore is performance-based grants for
incubation of new cities and Rs. 450 crore is for shared municipal
services.
- A sum
of Rs. 2,36,805 crore is earmarked for rural local bodies,
- Rs.1,21,055
crore for urban local bodies.
- Rs.70,051
crore for health grants through local
governments.
- Urban
local bodies have been categorised into two groups, based
on population, and different norms have been used for flow of
grants to each, based on their specific needs and aspirations.
- Basic
grants are proposed only for cities/towns having a population of less than
a million.
- For
Million-Plus cities, 100 per cent of the grants are performance-linked
through the Million-Plus Cities Challenge Fund (MCF).
Health:
- XVFC
has recommend that health spending by States should be increased to
more than 8 per cent of their budget by 2022.
- Given
the inter-State disparity in the availability of medical doctors, it is
essential to constitute an All India Medical and Health Service as is
envisaged under Section 2A of the All-India Services Act, 1951.
- The
total grants-in-aid support to the health sector over the award
period works out to Rs.1,06,606 crore, which is 10.3 per cent
of the total grants-in-aid recommended by XVFC. The grants for the health
sector will be unconditional.
- XVFC
has recommend health grants aggregating to Rs. 70,051 crore for urban
health and wellness centres (HWCs), building-less sub
centre, PHCs, CHCs, block level public health units, support for
diagnostic infrastructure for the primary healthcare activities and
conversion of rural sub centres and PHCs to HWCs. These grants will be
released to the local governments.
- Out
of the remaining grant of Rs. 31,755 crore
for the health sector (total of Rs. 1,06,606 crore minus Rs. 70, 051 crore
through local bodies and Rs.4800 crore state-specific grants),
- XVFC
has recommended Rs. 15,265 crore for critical care hospitals. This
includes Rs.13,367 crore for general States and Rs 1,898 crore for NEH
States.
- XVFC
has recommended Rs.13,296 crore for training of the allied healthcare
workforce. Out of this, Rs. 1,986 crore will be for NEH States and Rs.
11,310 crore for general States.
Performance
incentives and grants:
- XVFC
has recommended grants of Rs.4,800 crore (Rs. 1,200 crore each year)
from 2022-23 to 2025-26 for incentivising the States to enhance
educational outcomes.
- XVFC
has recommended Rs.6,143 crore for online learning and development of
professional courses (medical and engineering) in regional languages (matribhasha)
for higher education in India.
- XVFC
has recommended that Rs. 45,000 crore be kept as performance-based
incentive for all the States for carrying out agricultural reforms for
amending their land-related laws on the lines of NITI Aayog’s model law
incentive-based grants to States that maintain and augment groundwater
stock growth in agricultural exports production of oilseeds, pulses and
wood and wood-based products
- Apart
from above, following is the snapshot of grants.
S.no. |
Grant Components |
2021-26 |
1 |
Revenue
Deficit grants |
294514 |
2 |
Local governments
grants |
436361 |
3 |
Disaster
management grants |
122601 |
4 |
Sector-specific
grants |
129987 |
i |
Sectoral
grants for Health |
31755 |
Ii |
School
Education |
4800 |
iii |
Higher
Education |
6143 |
iv |
Implementation
of agricultural reforms |
45000 |
v |
Maintenance
of PMGSY roads |
27539 |
vi |
Judiciary |
10425 |
vii |
Statistics |
1175 |
viii |
Aspirational
districts and blocks |
3150 |
5 |
State-specific |
49599 |
|
Total |
1033062 |
Defence and
Internal Security
- Keeping
in view the extant strategic requirements for national defence in the
global context, XVFC has, in its approach, re-calibrated the relative
shares of Union and States in gross revenue receipts. This will enable
the Union to set aside resources for the special funding mechanism that
XVFC has proposed.
- The
Union Government may constitute in the Public Account of India, a
dedicated non-lapsable fund, Modernisation Fund for Defence and
Internal Security (MFDIS). The total indicative
size of the proposed MFDIS over the period 2021-26 is Rs.2,38,354
crore.
Disaster
Risk Management:
- Mitigation
Funds should be set up at both the national and State levels,
in line with the provisions of the Disaster Management Act. The Mitigation
Fund should be used for those local level and community-based
interventions which reduce risks and promote environment-friendly
settlements and livelihood practices.
- For
SDRMF, XVFC has recommended the total corpus of Rs.1,60,153
crore for States for disaster management for the duration of 2021-26, of
which the Union’s share is Rs. 1,22,601 crore and States’ share is
Rs. 37,552 crore.
- XVFC
has recommended six earmarked allocations for a total amount of Rs.
11,950 crore for certain priority areas, namely, two under the NDRF
(Expansion and Modernisation of Fire Services and Resettlement of
Displaced People affected by Erosion) and four under the NDMF (Catalytic
Assistance to Twelve Most Drought-prone States, Managing Seismic and
Landslide Risks in Ten Hill States, Reducing the Risk of Urban Flooding in
Seven Most Populous Cities and Mitigation Measures to Prevent Erosion).
Fiscal
consolidation
- Provided
range for fiscal deficit and debt path of both the Union and States.
- Additional
borrowing room to States based on performance in power sector reforms.
- A threshold
amount of annual appropriation should be fixed below which the funding
for a CSS may be stopped. Below the stipulated threshold, the administrating
department should justify the need for the continuation of the scheme.
As the life cycle of ongoing schemes has been made co-terminus with the
cycle of Finance Commissions, the third-party evaluation of all
CSSs should be completed within a stipulated timeframe. The flow of
monitoring information should be regular and should include credible
information on output and outcome indicators.
- In
view of the uncertainty that prevails at the stage that XVFC have done its
analysis, as well as the contemporary realities and challenges, we
recognise that the FRBM Act needs a major restructuring and recommend
that the time-table for defining and achieving debt sustainability may
be examined by a High-powered Inter-governmental Group. This
High-powered Group can craft the new FRBM framework and oversee its
implementation. It is important that the Union and State Governments
amend their FRBM Acts, based on the recommendations of the Group, so as to
ensure that their legislations are consistent with the fiscal
sustainability framework put in place.
- This
High-powered Inter-Governmental Group could also be tasked to oversee
the implementation of the 15th Finance Commission’s diverse
recommendations.
- State
Governments may explore formation of independent public debt management
cells which will chart their borrowing programme efficiently.